That's the question raised by Caribbean commentator Bud Slabbaert, who argues that money and power are not dangerous in themselves—but the compulsive pursuit of them can become addiction-like, affecting judgment, relationships, and leadership.

While "money addiction" and "power addiction" are not officially recognized psychiatric diagnoses, psychologists acknowledge that the pursuit of wealth, status, or influence can become compulsive, much like other behavioral addictions. The warning signs include never feeling that success is enough, constantly moving the goalposts, and measuring personal worth almost entirely by financial achievement or professional status.

As is explained, much of this behavior is linked to the brain's reward system. Success triggers the release of dopamine, the neurotransmitter associated with motivation and reward. Over time, however, yesterday's accomplishments may no longer provide the same sense of satisfaction, creating a desire for bigger promotions, greater influence, or more wealth. The focus gradually shifts from achieving meaningful goals to simply chasing the next reward.

Power can follow a similar pattern. Rather than serving others, leadership can become centered on maintaining influence, winning at all costs, or avoiding the loss of status. In those situations, relationships may be viewed primarily for their usefulness, criticism becomes difficult to accept, and protecting one's position can overshadow serving the public or an organization.

The commentary also introduces the concept of identity fusion—where individuals begin to define themselves almost entirely by their titles, authority, or financial success. When identity becomes tied to position or wealth, the fear of losing those things can become just as powerful as the desire to gain more.

Yet the author is careful to point out that success itself is not the problem. Many entrepreneurs, executives, and public leaders remain driven by innovation, philanthropy, public service, and solving real-world problems rather than personal accumulation. In those cases, wealth and influence remain tools—not ends in themselves.

For communities like St. Maarten, where leadership in government, business, and civil society carries significant responsibility, the article offers a timely reminder that effective leadership is ultimately measured by people, not possessions.

Businesses can generate profits, governments can implement policies, and organizations can expand their influence. But lasting success is often defined by whether leaders create opportunities for others, strengthen communities, and leave institutions better than they found them.

As the commentary concludes, fortunes can disappear and power eventually changes hands. The leaders remembered most are often not those who accumulated the greatest wealth or authority, but those who treated people with dignity, inspired trust, and helped others succeed. In the end, the strongest legacy may not be what we achieve—but the lives we positively influence along the way.