Electricity bills have been a major concern for households and businesses across Sint Maarten. Now, an independent investigation into GEBE’s fuel charges is entering a critical phase, while government officials are seeking answers directly from fuel supplier SOL.
But could the findings eventually mean relief for consumers?
The Bureau Telecommunication and Post, or BTP, has completed its preliminary examination of GEBE’s fuel-cost calculations for January through June 2026.
That includes the period when the fuel charge reached approximately 49 cents per kilowatt-hour.
According to TEATT Minister Grisha Heyliger-Marten, the review has identified several areas requiring further examination, including supplier markups, fuel-pricing structures, comparisons with regional prices and the allocation of electricity costs associated with water production.
Fuel supplier SOL has been given until October 15 to submit additional documentation after requesting more time.
The information will help BTP determine whether GEBE’s fuel charges were calculated and passed on to consumers appropriately.
But the investigation has not yet established that consumers were overcharged.
And no refund has been promised.
Minister Heyliger-Marten says that if the final findings establish that consumers are entitled to an adjustment, government will examine lawful options, including credits or other forms of relief.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Dr. Luc Mercelina has brought together Finance Minister Marinka Gumbs, parliamentarians from coalition and opposition parties, and representatives of SOL for a separate informational discussion.
That meeting examined fuel sourcing, transportation, storage, pricing benchmarks, supplier margins and the costs associated with supplying GEBE.
SOL explained that its gross margin is not the same as net profit, because operational expenses must also be covered.
The discussion also revealed concerns about the risks of maintaining fuel deliveries without a formal supply agreement.
Possible measures raised included competitive procurement, additional fuel storage, a maximum supplier margin and fuel hedging.
However, no agreement on lower fuel prices or reduced electricity bills was announced.
The Prime Minister stressed that the discussions would not interfere with BTP’s independent investigation.
And beyond the current review, another important development is expected.
BTP is preparing a draft regulatory framework by the end of November, intended to establish clearer and more consistent oversight of electricity tariffs and fuel charges.
For consumers, that could be significant.
Because the issue is not simply what GEBE paid for fuel during the first six months of this year.
It is also how those costs were calculated, how they reached electricity bills, and whether sufficient safeguards exist to protect consumers in the future.
The October 15 deadline is therefore an important next step, but not a deadline for refunds or a final ruling.
The question now is whether the investigation will produce greater transparency, stronger regulation and, ultimately, more affordable electricity for the people of Sint Maarten.